Trainer Nirad Karanjawala
and jockey B. Prakash cornered all the glory at the racecourse on Independence Day. A
splendid show from Fine Arrow, a maiden gelding by Bold Russian out of Strange Signature,
in the feature event that fetched these two professionals the honours of the day.
Judging the pace of the mile-and-a-quarter journey to a nicety, jockey B. Prakash timed
his challenge to perfection astride the 10 to 1 underdog Fine Arrow and romped home in
style from Chelsea and Tap On Power. Indeed it was a commendable show from Fine Arrow
whose best career effort was finishing second behind Mujahedin at Mumbai.
Taking part in the two mock races held here seems to have immensely benefited this
Nirad Karanjawala-trained four-year-old gelding. Settled in the mid-bunch, Fine Arrow was
alerted by jockey B. Prakash only when the race took a serious turn for home. In a flash,
Fine Arrow went past La Tour DArgent and kept going from Chelsea who was hard ridden
by Mallesh Narredu to hold on to the second berth from Tap On Power.
It is not take any credit away from either B. Prakash or Fine Arrow but it needs to be
mentioned here that Tap On Power was unable to find a clear path but for which he would
have run much closer to the winner. Jockey C. Rajendra aboard Tap On Power was cramped for
room when making his final move as Aslam Kader too decided to throw his hat into the ring
at this juncture. In doing so he denied Tap On Power any room to manoeuvre his way to the
front. But more than Aslam Kader, jockey C. Rajendra should blame himself for finding
himself in a mess. Fargo raised some hopes by coming into contention at the bend but soon
they faded away.
Halfway through the days proceedings, an atrocious attempt to disrupt the Land of
Glory Plate was made by some anti-social elements. Fortunately for the punters their plans
were foiled and Mille Fiori won with ease. But some professionals involved in this race
were unhappy with prudish attitude of the RWITC top brass.
Reliable reports suggest that when the senior stipe Dady Adenwalla noticed the
intrusion on the tracks he made contact with his colleague Pradyumna Singh on the
walkie-talkie set and reportedly asked him "to caution the jockeys of the impending
danger ahead and stop riding". Accordingly, Mr Singh (who was travelling in the club
vehicle that accompanies the field of horses when the race is actually run) called out and
waved his arms at the jockeys asking them to take it easy. This was confirmed in the
replay of the race after watching Mark Gallagher astride Win A Million and C. Ruzaan atop
Piaget ease their mounts in response to Mr Singhs call. Meanwhile, Mille Fiori drew
away from her rivals.
Instead of informing the racing public about the facts, all the RWITC stipes did was to
call a stewards enquiry in which the stewards were apprised of the entire incident and
also the circumstances which led to the jockeys pulling up their respective mounts. The
outcome of the enquiry did not affect the judges order of placing.
But showing scant respect for the reputation of the professionals, the authorities did
not inform the public that the jockeys were merely following their instructions and there
was no malpractice involved. This entire episode found a fleeting mention in race day
report of the RWITC, which fails to shed any light on the incident. Just imagine C.
Rajendra easing Mille Fiori and allowing some other horse to win this race. Would the
stipes and the stewards have behaved in the same way as they did on Tuesday?
Associated with the victories of Conflagration, Dendrobium and Mille Fiori, C. Rajendra
made steady progress in his bid to retain the championship title. Jockey B. Prakash
increased his tally through Perfect Placement and Fine Arrow.
The last two races on Tuesday left too many questions unanswered. Will anybody out
there please explain the reason for Future Arrives poor showing and the sudden
reversal of form that transformed stablemate Phrwaxshi into a winner in the same race? Was
"load-shedding" the reason behind the powerless performance of High Voltage who
had run close behind Polish Nobility? If "horses are not machines" is the answer
to these questions, didnt we know that already.